Home > Bible Prophecy, End Times, Eschatology > Could the White Horse of Revelation be the Ongoing Great Commision?

Could the White Horse of Revelation be the Ongoing Great Commision?

February 13, 2009 Leave a comment Go to comments
For context………..
The Great Commission

28:16 So 22 the eleven disciples went to Galilee to the mountain Jesus had designated. 28:17 When 23 they saw him, they worshiped him, 24 but some doubted. 25 28:18 Then Jesus came up and said to them, 26 “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 28:19 Therefore go 27 and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 28 28:20 teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And remember, 29 I am with you 30 always, to the end of the age.” 31  Matthew 28

I have been studying very closely lately, and trying to put aside prior teaching, and just read the word for what it says. That’s not easy. Today, I wanted to spend some time studying Rev 6: 1-2.

Rev 6:1-2

6:1 I looked on when the Lamb opened one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures saying with a thunderous voice, “Come!” 6:2 So I looked, and here came a white horse! The one who rode it had a bow, and he was given a crown, and as a conqueror he rode out to conquer.

I spent time looking at the original Greek (see link at top) for each word, especially within verse two. While holding prior teaching at bay in my mind, It seemed that this first horse rider could be the going forth of the gospel/fulfilling of great commission.

I have been VERY reluctant to sway from traditional teaching, but I’ve been praying a lot that God will teach me through his word and that I will not rabbit-trail myself into self-delusion. Know that I present this without thinking of it as being “for sure”, but intriguing and I want my fellow brothers and sisters take on it as well. Traditional teaching says that the White Horse rider is most likely the Antichrist, but the other 3 riders are figurative and do not represent literal men. I’m wondering if maybe the white horse rider is also not a literal man in being consistent with the whole passage.

We know that a white horse is the type of horse Jesus comes back on at the second coming. The word for “white” describing the Horse, is “leukov” (3022), which means “light, bright, brilliant”. The other verse where it is used are as follows:

Luk 9:29
As 1 he was praying, 2 the appearance of his face was transformed, 3 and his clothes became very bright, a brilliant white. 4

Rev 6:2
So 1 I looked, 2 and here came 3 a white horse! The 4 one who rode it 5 had a bow, and he was given a crown, 6 and as a conqueror 7 he rode out to conquer.

Rev 19:11
Then 1 I saw heaven opened and here came 2 a white horse! The 3 one riding it was called “Faithful” and “True,” and with justice 4 he judges and goes to war.

In the Greek, the word for bow is “toxon” (5115). It is the only time it is used in the new testament. It literally means “a bow” and it is derived from the base word of the word “tikto” (5088).

Tikto – 1) to bring forth, bear, produce (fruit from the seed)
1a) of a woman giving birth
1b) of the earth bringing forth its fruits
1c) metaph. to bear, bring forth

Tikto’s base is as follows…a strengthened form of a primary teko tek’-o (which is used only as
alternate in certain tenses); to produce (from seed, as a mother, a
plant, the earth, etc.), literally or figuratively:-bear, be born,
bring forth, be delivered, be in travail.

Based on the above I think it would be fair to say that the white horse rider has a bow that represents production and growth, and being in travail. Could this represent the spread of the gospel growth of Christianity, and being in travail the promise that jesus made that we would have trials?

While the rider already had the bow, he was given a crown “stephanov” Definition:

http://net.bible.org/strong.php?id=4735

; Other passages with the same word:

http://net.bible.org/search.php?search= … x:stefanov

“Stephanov” is a “reward crown”.

“..and as a conqueror he rode out to conquer.” (both 3528)

http://net.bible.org/strong.php?id=3528

Conqueror in greek is “nikwn“:

Same word used here:
Rev 21:7
The one who conquers 1 will inherit these things, and I will be his God and he will be my son.
1Jo 5:5
Now who is the person who has conquered the world except the one who believes that 1 Jesus is the Son of God?

Rev 2:11
The one who has an ear had better hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one who conquers 1 will in no way be harmed by the second death.’

Rev 2:26
And to the one who conquers 1 and who continues in 2 my deeds until the end, I will give him authority over the nations 3 –

Rev 3:5
The one who conquers 1 will be dressed like them 2 in white clothing, 3 and I will never 4 erase 5 his name from the book of life, but 6 will declare 7 his name before my Father and before his angels.

Rev 3:21
I will grant the one 1 who conquers 2 permission 3 to sit with me on my throne, just as I too conquered 4 and sat down with my Father on his throne.

Rev 6:2
So 1 I looked, 2 and here came 3 a white horse! The 4 one who rode it 5 had a bow, and he was given a crown, 6 and as a conqueror 7 he rode out to conquer.

Rev 3:12
The one who conquers 1 I will make 2 a pillar in the temple of my God, and he will never depart from it. I 3 will write on him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God (the new Jerusalem that comes down out of heaven from my God), 4 and my new name as well.

Conquer in greek is “nikhsh”

Same word used here:

Luk 11:22
But 1 when a stronger man 2 attacks 3 and conquers him, he takes away the first man’s 4 armor on which the man relied 5 and divides up 6 his plunder. 7

Rev 6:2
So 1 I looked, 2 and here came 3 a white horse! The 4 one who rode it 5 had a bow, and he was given a crown, 6 and as a conqueror 7 he rode out to conquer.

Now read the Luke 11 passage in full context:

Jesus and Beelzebul
11:14 Now he was casting out a demon that was mute. When the demon had gone out, the man who had been mute began to speak, and the crowds were amazed. 11:15 But some of them said, “By the power of Beelzebul, the ruler of demons, he casts out demons.” 11:16 Others, to test him, began asking for a sign from heaven. 11:17 But Jesus, realizing their thoughts, said to them, “Every kingdom divided against itself is destroyed, and a divided household falls. 11:18 So if Satan too is divided against himself, how will his kingdom stand? I ask you this because you claim that I cast out demons by Beelzebul. 11:19 Now if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they will be your judges. 11:20 But if I cast out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has already overtaken you. 11:21 When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his possessions are safe. 11:22 But when a stronger man attacks and conquers him, he takes away the first man’s armor on which the man relied and divides up his plunder. 11:23 Whoever is not with me is against me, and whoever does not gather with me scatters.

I am slowly coming to a conclusion there there is something to a “6th seal barley rapture” and that the book that is sealed contains the trumpets and bowls of wrath to be unleashed during the final 3.5 years. I won’t get into all that now as it’s been discussed all over this forum, and I only say it as background info from where I am coming from. That would make seals 1-5 prior to the rapture, seal 6 perhaps at the same time as postualted by David Lowe in his books Earthquake Ressurection and The His Voice Shook the Earth.

http://www.earthquakeresurrection.com/

Could it actually be that the White horse rider is the work of the church in fulfilling the great commision?

Go easy on me, I am sincere in my research and study, do not wish to confuse anyone else, and am praying for discernment. I’m having a lot of problems accepting the white horse rider as the A/C or representative of “strife” based on the Greek, so please point out anything I am missing.

Thanks for reading, I know it was long.

  1. February 13, 2009 at 7:14 am | #1

    The word studies are very interesting and you make some very good and valid observations regarding the Church and the Great Commission in the endtimes. We must indeed continue to preach the gospel until Jesus comes again to take us home, whenever that may be. So I can see how you make the connection with the Church and the rider on the white horse going forth to conquor. Yes, in this world, we are “… more than conquerors through him that loved us ” ( Romans 8:37 ). The Tribulation saints, though they will suffer martyrdom ( Revelation 20:4 ) will overcome Satan and his Antichrist too through the word of their testimony and by the blood of Christ ( Revelation 12:11 ) but I believe they are a different group of believers living in a different dispensation in the same sense as the Old Testament saints were different. The 144,000 Jewish evangelists will be God’s servants preaching the gospel in those days ( Revelation 7:2-8 ) as well as God’s two witnesses, probably the prophet Elijah being one of them, who will appear on the earth at that time ( Revelation 11:3-13 ). People living in the Tribulation Period will have an opportunity to hear the gospel and believe on the name of Jesus Christ if they had not already heard the gospel and rejected Christ before. However, after the letters to the seven churches I don’t find any mention of the Church being in the world or fulfilling the Great Commission in the Book of Revelation. If you do then please correct me.

    Of course, I believe that the rider on the white horse is symbolic of the Antichrist. The parallels with Jesus Christ only confirm that in my mind. In my view all of the four horsemen of the apocalypse are harbringers of God’s judgment and wrath. All of them bring forth evil and devestation upon the earth and it’s inhabitants. Antichrist will be Satan’s counterfeit messiah and he will appear to be like Jesus, at least at the beginning. To an Christ-rejecting world he will be seen as a man of peace ( Daniel 8:25 ) doing signs and wonders but he will persecute and make war on the saints of God who are alive on the earth in that day ( Revelation 13:7; Daniel 7:25 ).

    The only way that I can reconcile the rider on the white horse being symbolic of the Great Commission or the Church is if I were to embrace dominion theology which I don’t because I reject it as a false teaching and I think the Book of Revelation itself discredits dominion theology. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying that is what you are promoting here but only that what you are saying reminds me of those teachings. I would also have to lay aside my dispensational view of biblical interpretation because I believe that the Church Age comes to a close with the beginning of the 70th Week of Daniel or the 7 year Tribulation Period. According to my understanding of the Book of Revelation the Church will be in Heaven with Christ when He begins to open the seals of the book. If what you are saying is true then that means the Church will still be in the world and will go through the Tribulation. I would then have to also embrace a mid-trib or a post-trib view of the Rapture of the Church as well.

    I’m won’t be dogmatic and say that you are wrong. I may be the one who is wrong. One way or another I do believe that we are going to find out very soon. Jesus is coming! Amen.

    BTW, Congressman Ron Paul ( R-TX ) said an interesting thing recently. Regarding the War on Terror he said, ” America “is determined to have martial law (to get people) fearful enough that THEY WILL ACCEPT THE MAN ON THE WHITE HORSE. …This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears (as) a protector.”

    I like your website here and your writings are always interesting. God bless you :)

  2. Yeshua the Lord of Glory
    February 13, 2009 at 10:47 am | #2

    Intriguing indeed…

    I have been on more than a few rabbit trails myself…Better said seeking. So i know what you mean…When i started reading David Lowman’s blog all of that changed. I saw truth from the scriptures that my former eschatological view[s] did not allow…I wont try to link his blog address to your page,i am sure that i will not do it right… I will just ask him to read your blog,i hope that is ok with you.

    I have to tell you that your use of Luke chapter 11 makes me think that you are on to something significant,concerning the “WHITE HORSE” and the spreading of the Gospel or the Great commission.

  3. Wisdom Of The World
    February 13, 2009 at 4:25 pm | #3

    Bill thank you for taking the time to write out your veiws on this. I am definitley not wanting to argue my veiw, but am open to learn right now, hence the intense studies. Let me assure you that I have no regard for dominion theology. As for the pre-trib, mid-trib, post-trib argument….I don’t know if I subscribe to ANY of those at this time. I know how that sounds, but something’s not right so that’s why I’ve started studying much more deeply. One very interesting set of studies I came across was http://www.tribulationmyths.com. I was not too crazy about the name of the site at first, but when I got there, I saw that they are just studying the scriptures like most of us do who study prophecy. I don’t know if their veiw is right, but it sure is compelling. I am not hoping for any particular view to be true, I am just searching for the truth about it. I know men and women have been studying this for hundreds of years and I do not discount that. It’s just something I feel compelled to do. God bless you :)

  4. low5point
    February 13, 2009 at 4:25 pm | #4

    I was directed to you blog by a regular reader of my blog. She was wondering about what you wrote and was asking my opinion. I also noted you were looking for feedback. I would have two things to say.

    1. Don’t fret, the view you are espousing – in regards to the white horse – is MUCH MORE TRADITIONAL than what you believe is the “traditional” view. Long before modern “Left behind” theologians came along in the 1800’s the view you mentioned was quite popular and readily accepted. The Puritans, Reformers and all the way back to Augustine and before that was the view…don’t let modern prophecy “experts” tell you otherwise.

    2. You’re right on! Today’s theologians you would be in agreement with in regards to the rider of the white horse include RC Sproul, Gary DeMar, Ken Gentry, Keith Mathison, Greg Bahnsen and a host more.

    In regards to the pre-6th seal Rapture, perhaps you’re not looking far enough back in history for these events. And in regards to the Antichrist “itself” just do a 2 minute study on every time the term is used and see how the term is used.

    A lot more could be said but this is your blog not mine :)

    David Lowman

    low5point.wordpress.com

  5. Wisdom Of The World
    February 13, 2009 at 4:37 pm | #5

    Hi David,

    Thanks for commenting. I am aware of what you’ve written above and have more studies ahead of me. I’ll be sure to visit your blog as well.

    God bless….

  6. low5point
    February 13, 2009 at 5:00 pm | #6

    If embracing the White Horse as the Great Commission or Christ leading the fulfillment of the Great Commission leads to false teaching then the entire Church for nearly 1800 years embraced false teaching. Postmillennialism and Amillennialism from Justin Martyr to Augustine to the Reformers, Puritans, Jonathan Edwards to Machen, Warfield and Sproul all embrace false teaching.

    So, the gates of hell do prevail?

    The knowledge of God won’t cover the earth like water covers the sea?

    The weeds aren’t bundled up and thrown into the fire leaving the wheat? Oh, that’s right, Jesus was wrong when he said the weeds go first. He should have said the wheat just disappears?

    The water coming from Ezekiel’s temple dries up?

    Only in the past 150 years when we have wrenched the events of the past and forced them into the future has the negative view of the Church and her mission grown in acceptance. Same with the artificial and VERY RECENT wrenching the 70th week out of it’s context and making God a liar by forcing it into some future it never speaks of.

    It is the pessimistic view of the Church, her mission and her future that is the “johnny come lately” and the rejecter of historic truths.

    David Lowman

  1. No trackbacks yet.